Legal Opinion

State v. Carrasquillo

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 22, 2002No. 00-438PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal by defendant Carrasquillo from the trial court’s limitation of Carrasquillo’s cross-examination of a State’s witness who had allegedly assaulted Carrasquillo subsequent to the events underlying this appeal. Defendant also argues on appeal that the evidence presented at trial was quantitatively insufficient, as a matter of law, to satisfy the “substantial period” element of Vermont’s kidnapping statute, 13 V.S.A. § 2404(3)(C). We affirm.

Defendant Carrasquillo was an inmate at the South Burlington Correctional Facility when he was charged, under a four-count information, with…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. Ben-Mont CorporationSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
  2. State v. La FranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
  3. State v. FangerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  4. State v. KoveosSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  5. State v. MearsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. GoodhueSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
  2. State v. SistrunkMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
  4. Billings v. Billings, Sr.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  5. State v. EllisSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API