Legal Opinion
Reilly Tar & Chemical Corp. v. City of St. Louis Park
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 26, 1963No. 38,758PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Thomas Gallagher, Justice.
Relator, Reilly Tar and Chemical Corporation, a corporation doing business in the city of St. Louis Park, appeals from an order of the District Court of Hennepin County granting a motion of respondent, the city of St. Louis Park, for an order quashing a writ of certiorari issued on behalf of relator for the purpose of reviewing and determining the validity of the proceedings under which respondent city established on March 5, 1962, a housing and redevelopment authority pursuant to Minn. St. 462.425, subds. 1 and 2. Subdivision 1 provides:
“There is hereby created in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- City of Chicago v. VaccarroIllinois Supreme Court · 1951
- Town of Ames v. WybrantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
- In Re Condemnation by Dairyland Power CooperativeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Hendershott v. RogersMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
- Minnesota Canal & Power Co. v. Fall Lake Boom Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Costley v. Caromin House, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- City of Minneapolis v. WurteleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- City of Shakopee v. Minnesota Valley Electric CooperativeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Beatty v. Winona Housing & Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- City of Pipestone Ex Rel. Spannaus v. HalbersmaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.