Franco v. Mudford
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
1Opinion of the CourtLoConto, P.J.
Aggrieved by the trial judge’s allowance of the defendants Motion to Dismiss pursuant to M.RC.R, Rule 12(b) (6), and a Special Motion pursuant to G.L.c. 231, §59H, the plaintiff, pro se, commenced this appeal in accordance with District/Municipal Courts Rules for Appellate Division Appeal, Rule 8C. The facts and issues necessary for an understanding of this appeal are as follows. The plaintiff brought a two count complaint against his former spouse seeking damages for malicious prosecution and abuse of process (Count I) and for tort recovery under a theory of trespass quare clausum fregit…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Correllas v. ViveirosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Wilcox v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Jones v. Brockton Public Markets, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- McLarnon v. JokischMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
- Wood v. GravesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Jenkins v. EllisMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2008
- Tisbert v. AmeenMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2015