Legal Opinion

Pittas v. Hartford Life Insurance

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 17, 2007No. Civil Action 06-65PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION and ORDER OF COURT

AMBROSE, Chief Judge.

SYNOPSIS

Pending are Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment. (Docket Nos. 30 and 32). The parties have responded thereto. Based on my opinion set forth below, Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 30) is denied and Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 32) is granted in part and denied in part.

I. BACKGROUND

Defendant, Hartford Life Insurance Company, issued a group policy of accident insurance to AAA West Penn/West NAj South Central OH (“AAA”) for AAA members (“the Policy”). The Princeton Corporation (“Princeton”) serves as…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Anthony J. Chipollini v. Spencer Gifts, Inc., a Delaware Corporation. Appeal of Anthony J. ChipolliniCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  4. Terletsky v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. James R. WHITE, Appellant, v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Thomer v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Oehlmann v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. MOORE v. USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API