Pittas v. Hartford Life Insurance
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER OF COURT
AMBROSE, Chief Judge.
SYNOPSIS
Pending are Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment. (Docket Nos. 30 and 32). The parties have responded thereto. Based on my opinion set forth below, Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 30) is denied and Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 32) is granted in part and denied in part.
I. BACKGROUND
Defendant, Hartford Life Insurance Company, issued a group policy of accident insurance to AAA West Penn/West NAj South Central OH (“AAA”) for AAA members (“the Policy”). The Princeton Corporation (“Princeton”) serves as…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Anthony J. Chipollini v. Spencer Gifts, Inc., a Delaware Corporation. Appeal of Anthony J. ChipolliniCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Terletsky v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- James R. WHITE, Appellant, v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Thomer v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- Oehlmann v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
- MOORE v. USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024