Legal Opinion

Hoffman v. Rhoads Construction Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 6, 1934No. Appeal 46PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

The claimant’s husband, Elisha Hoffman, died following a heated argument with his foreman, over the subject of his arriving late at his work. The argument lasted five or ten minutes and was accompanied by provocative epithets by the foreman and some gesticulations by Hoffman. At the conclusion of the argument Hoffman mounted his Toky’ engine, on which he was employed as engineer, ran it about 1,000 or 1,500 feet, stopped to take a drink of coffee and either dismounted or fell from the engine and died a few minutes thereafter. No assault was made upon him by the foreman.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Lacey v. Washburn & Williams Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. International Travelers' Ass'n v. BranumTexas Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Ewing v. Pittsb. C. & St. L. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  4. Urian v. Scranton Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. Howarth v. Adams Express Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Royko v. Logan Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. Koplin v. Louis K. Liggett Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Crispin v. Leedom Worrall Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Pastva v. Forge Coal Min. Co., Ap.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Federal Rice Drug Company, a Corporation, in No. 19,540 v. Queen Insurance Company of America, a Corporation, in No. 19,541Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API