Mitcham v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
BELCHER, Judge.
The conviction is for the felony offense of driving while intoxicated under 802b, P.C.
It appears from the agreement of the attorneys for both the state and the appellant and the certificate of approval by the trial judge that the statement of facts does not contain all of the evidence adduced on the trial, hence the sufficiency of the evidence cannot be appraised. Dominguez v. State, 164 Tex. Cr. Rep. 571, 303 S.W. 2d 384; Stockman v. State, 164 Tex. Cr. Rep. 469, 303 S.W. 2d 410.
This conviction rests upon the following verdict of the Jury:
“We the jury, find the defendant…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cobb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1940
- Stockman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1957
- Dominguez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1957
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1959
- Little Tarkio Drainage District No. One v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cooper v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1963
- Rose v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Bailey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1961
- Wheeler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1960
- Paul Kevin Keys v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.