Van Arsdel v. Addison Township
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtMcGregor, P. J.
This is a case attacking the validity of a zoning ordinance. The trial court, sitting without a jury, heard the case and issued a comprehensive finding of facts in his opinion, which the record sustains, and which we quote:
“Plaintiff Billy M. Van Arsdel, a property owner and real estate broker, purchased 154 acres of land in Section 19 of Addison Township, defendant, on July 28, 1966. At that time and until the present the permitted use under the township zoning ordinance is “agricultural”. In such areas only one-family dwellings on not less than ten-acre parcels are allowed.
“In the fall of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Nectow v. City of CambridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Washington Ex Rel. Seattle Title Trust Co. v. RobergeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Brae Burn, Inc. v. City of Bloomfield HillsMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Biske v. City of TroyMichigan Supreme Court · 1969
- Rottman v. Township of WaterfordMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Frericks v. Highland TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
- Sun Oil Co. v. City of Madison HeightsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
- Sun Oil Co. v. City of Madison HeightsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972