Legal Opinion

Lengyel v. Brandmiller

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1942No. 28822 and 28838PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.

It is urged that the trial court committed prejudicial error in refusing to allow counsel to examine the complete panel of those called as prospective jurors in the cause, and in denying each defendant the right to exercise four peremptory challenges.

Whatever merit there might be in those contentions if they had been raised at the proper time, it is evident from the bill of exceptions that the persons called for jury service were examined, accepted and sworn as jurors, before counsel registered any complaint in the particulars noted.

From this state of the record, we are of the opinion that if…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Kobelt v. BakerOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Cooper v. BradlynOhio Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Heckert v. PatrickOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Grimes v. HaslettAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. SanchezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Ditmyer v. Board of County Commissioners of Lucas CountyOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Carney v. McAfeeOhio Supreme Court · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API