Legal Opinion

Carney v. McAfee

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1988No. 87-155PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

The gravamen of this case is whether a municipality can be held liable under R.C. 723.01 for damages resulting from an automobile accident on a bridge located on a state highway within the municipality, where the bridge was designed and constructed by the state and the state is responsible for maintaining and inspecting the structure.

All of appellees’ claims against appellant were premised on alleged violations of R.C. 723.01. Thus, if appellant owed a duty to appellees, which would be a prerequisite to liability, it would be a duty that arises under R.C. 723.01. This statute, as it read at…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Taylor v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Haverlack v. Portage Homes, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Enghauser Manufacturing Co. v. Eriksson Engineering Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Mitchell v. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Strohofer v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sherwin Williams Co. v. Dayton Freight LinesOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Solitaria v. StallardOhio Supreme Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API