Legal Opinion
United States v. Howard
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided February 8, 1956No. 872PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHESNUT, District Judge.
In the above matter there is a motion before the court filed by Philip Joseph Howell for the return to him of certain property which had previously been seized by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, an Agency of the United States, under a search warrant issued by the Honorable Roszel C. Thomsen, Chief Judge of this court. The United States Attorney opposes the return of any of the seized property. The motion has been heard in court on evidence and arguments by Herbert H. Hubbard, court appointed counsel for the claimant, and James H. Langrall and Robert R. Bair,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Marron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Rea v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Honig v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- American Fidelity Fire Insurance v. Construcciones Werl, Inc.District Court, Virgin Islands · 1975
- United States v. Charles T. MaudeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Herbert Roberts, Joan Roberts, and Lewis BrombergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Brooks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
- Woo Lai Chun v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.