Legal Opinion
Brooks v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided May 7, 1964No. [No. 252, September Term, 1963.]PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHorney, J.
The principal question presented by this appeal is whether a search incident to one offense justified the seizure of items connected with another offense.
About 10:30 in the morning of February 27, 1962, the defendant (Alfonso Arkell Brooks, Jr.) went to the home of Margaret Griffith in Upper Marlboro, asked her where someone lived and told her he was interested in buying race horses. At that time she observed that the automobile of the defendant was of a dark color. Later (about 11:00 o’clock), when she went to her kitchen to prepare dinner, she noticed a similar dark colored automobile at…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Marron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Go-Bart Importing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- United States v. LefkowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Jordan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Cross v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- In RE McNEAR v. RhayWashington Supreme Court · 1965
- State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Anglin v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1967
- Boswell v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1968
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.