Legal Opinion · Dissent

Brodsky v. Maloney

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1960No. File 9811Published

1DissentBiegelmeier, Judge

If this property was the homestead at the time the first mechanics’ lien claim came into existence the mechanics’ claims are not liens. Our opinions allowing the homestead exemptions were mainly based on an ownership of the property by deed. An exception was Smith v. Allmendinger, 41 *615S.D. 144, 169 N.W. 512, where the claimant had a contract for deed, occupied the property since October 1915 and received -his deed in July 1916; the materials were furnished in May 1916. There intent, actual occupancy and a valid contract for deed were present. In The Home Lumber Co. v. Heckel, 67 S.D. 429, 293…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kingman v. O'CallaghanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Botsford Lumber Co. v. SchriverSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Hickman v. LongSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Brettschneider v. WellmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  5. Crawford v. CarterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API