Legal Opinion

Crawford v. Carter

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1952No. File 9243PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

In this action, brought by Joe Crawford, to quiet his title to a one-acre tract of land, the defendant L. A. Carter counterclaimed for specific performance of an oral contract to convey. A judgment for specific performance was reversed by this court for the reason that the family homestead of Crawford embraced the acre, and Mrs. Crawford was not a party to the proceeding. Crawford v. Carter, 72 S. D. 514, 37 N.W.2d 241. After Mrs. Crawford had been added as a party defendant Carter filed and served his cross complaint praying specific performance of the above mentioned agreement.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Philpot v. GruningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. O'Hara v. WattsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Houck v. HultSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Scott v. LiechtiSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Rhode v. FarupSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of GosmireSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Skjoldal v. MyrenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Ward v. MelbySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Vanston v. RupeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1953
  5. Habeck v. SampsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API