Legal Opinion

Drennon v. Fisher

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided August 16, 2005No. 29702PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GUTIERREZ, Judge.

Richard Drennon appeals from the dismissal of his pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse.

I

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL SUMMARY

Drennon is an inmate incarcerated under the custody of the Idaho Department of Correction (IDOC) at the Idaho Maximum Security Institution (IMSI). On October 9, 2002, Drennon filed a verified petition for writ of habeas corpus. The petition alleged that certain conditions of Drennon’s confinement violated his constitutional rights. Among other things, Drennon asserted that the IMSI staff retaliated against him…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Gomez v. VernonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  3. Mahaffey v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Bunn v. BunnIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Clark v. OlsenIdaho Supreme Court · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Drennon v. Idaho State Correctional InstitutionIdaho Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Hoots v. CravenIdaho Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Burghart v. CarlinIdaho Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Kevin Brown v. Idaho Parole Comm.Idaho Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. O-KelIdaho Court of Appeals · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API