Legal Opinion
Burghart v. Carlin
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided August 26, 2011No. 38137PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
LANSING, Judge.
Randolf L. Burghart appeals from the district court’s order dismissing Burghart’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus, brought against the Commission of Pardons and Parole (the Commission) and Terema Carlin (hereinafter collectively referred to as the Respondents). We affirm in part and reverse in part.
I
BACKGROUND
According to Burghart’s pro se habeas corpus petition, he began serving a twenty-year unified sentence, with five years determinate, in 1998 for a crime that is not revealed in the record. His petition, though hardly clear on this point, appears to allege that he was…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Young v. City of KetchumIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
- Quinlan v. Idaho Commission for Pardons & ParoleIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Jason Demar v. Warden Randy BladesIdaho Court of Appeals · 2013