Autoville, Inc. v. Friedman
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
JACOBSON, Chief Judge of Division One.
This appeal raises the issue of whether an action for conversion will lie against a used automobile dealership and its stockholders for appropriating the proceeds of sales of automobiles in contravention of a financing agreement.
Plaintiff s-appellees, Phillip Friedman and Patricia Friedman (Friedman) brought an action against defendants-appellants, Autoville, Inc., its two stockholders, Irving Caplan and Joseph Siegel, and their respective wives, and Reserve Insurance Company, an insurance company which issued a bond covering the acts of Autoville…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Belford Trucking Co. v. ZagarDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
- Hull v. FreedmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
- Reese v. CraditCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
- Britton v. . FerrinNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Markel v. Transamerica Title Insurance CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1968
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Roderick Dev. Inv. Co. v. Community Bank of EdgewaterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
- Case Corp. v. GehrkeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- M-R Sullivan Manufacturing Co. v. Sullivan (In Re Sullivan)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
- Ferguson v. Coronado Oil Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- Stokes v. StokesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.