Legal Opinion

Autoville, Inc. v. Friedman

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 31, 1973No. 1 CA-CIV 1833PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACOBSON, Chief Judge of Division One.

This appeal raises the issue of whether an action for conversion will lie against a used automobile dealership and its stockholders for appropriating the proceeds of sales of automobiles in contravention of a financing agreement.

Plaintiff s-appellees, Phillip Friedman and Patricia Friedman (Friedman) brought an action against defendants-appellants, Autoville, Inc., its two stockholders, Irving Caplan and Joseph Siegel, and their respective wives, and Reserve Insurance Company, an insurance company which issued a bond covering the acts of Autoville…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Belford Trucking Co. v. ZagarDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
  2. Hull v. FreedmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  3. Reese v. CraditCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  4. Britton v. . FerrinNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  5. Markel v. Transamerica Title Insurance CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1968

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Roderick Dev. Inv. Co. v. Community Bank of EdgewaterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  2. Case Corp. v. GehrkeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  3. M-R Sullivan Manufacturing Co. v. Sullivan (In Re Sullivan)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
  4. Ferguson v. Coronado Oil Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Stokes v. StokesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API