Legal Opinion
Baxter v. Peterson
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 8, 2007No. B188676PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
58 Cal.Rptr.3d 686 (2007)
150 Cal.App.4th 673
Harold BAXTER, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
Gail PETERSON, Defendant and Appellant.
No. B188676.
Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Five.
May 8, 2007.
Wong & Mak, Fred Wong, Alhambra; Benedon & Serlin, Gerald M. Serlin and Douglas G. Benedon, Los Angeles, for Defendant and Appellant.
Ivie, McNeill & Wyatt, Robert H. McNeill, Jr., Los Angeles, and John C. Fauvre, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Certified for Partial Publication.[*]
MOSK, J.
INTRODUCTION
Defendant and appellant Gail Peterson appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiff and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Neal v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Adams v. MurakamiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Tenzer v. Superscope, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985
- Henderson v. Harnischfeger Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Simon v. San Paolo US Holding Co., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Scheherezade Sharabianlou v. KarpCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Pooshs v. Phillip Morris USA, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
- Green v. Laibco, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Hill v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Farmers & Merchants Trust Co. v. Vanetik, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.