Legal Opinion

Hill v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 18, 2016No. A145893PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RICHMAN, J.

Petitioners in this writ proceeding are Deirdre Hill and Vincent G. Hughes (collectively petitioners), co-executors of their mother’s estate. They filed a proceeding against their stepfather, Frank Staggers, Sr., to recover property belonging to the estate, which among other things requested a judgment for twice the value of the property recovered, as provided for by Probate Code section 859 (usually, double damages). Petitioners’ stepfather died, and his son was substituted as his successor. He moved for summary adjudication on the double damages claim, on the basis that…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Silberg v. California Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Adams v. MurakamiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Davis v. HearstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. CHATEAU CHAMBERAY HOA v. Associated Internat. Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. Garrett v. Coast & Southern Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kerley v. Weber, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. Rogers v. Nguyen (In re Ribal), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  3. Conservatorship of RibalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
  4. Kerley v. WeberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
  5. L.A. Unified School Dist. v. Super. Ct.California Supreme Court · 2023

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API