Legal Opinion

St. Paul Reinsurance Co., Inc. v. Irons

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 7, 2001No. 00-1478PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Donald L. Corbin, Justice.

This case is before us on a petition for review from ,the Arkansas Court of Appeals. At issue, is whether an insurer is required to pay the full face value of an insurance policy, as provided, under Arkansas’s valued-policy statute, codified at Ark. Code. Ann. § 23-88-101 (Repl. 1999), where the insured obtained two separate insurance policies for one insurable interest. We agree with the court of appeals that this is an issue of first impression; as such, initial jurisdiction was proper in this court pursuant to Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 1-2(b)(1). We affirm.

Appellee Cheryl…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Adams v. ArthurSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. George v. Jefferson Hosp. Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  3. Pugh v. GriggsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  4. Angle v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  5. Worth v. City of RogersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Schubert v. Auto Owners InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  2. Rhodes v. Farmers Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002
  3. Nicolaou v. Vermont Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
  4. Andy Brumley and Sheri Brumley v. Richard Howard McDuff and Sara Sullivan McDuff, Individually and as Co-Trustees of the McDuff Trust, the Erin Elizabeth McDuff Trust, and the MacKie Ann McDuff Trust Erin Elizabeth McDuff, Individually and as Co-Trustee of the Erin Elizabeth McDuff Trust And MacKie Ann McDuff, Individually and as Co-Trustee of the MacKie Ann McDuff TrustTexas Supreme Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API