Vaulx v. Cumis Insurance Society, Inc.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
FERREN, Associate Judge:
This case presents the question whether an insurance carrier properly terminated an automobile insurance policy for failure of the insured to comply with the terms of a reinstatement offer. The carrier received the premium by the date it had required for reinstatement. When the insured mailed his payment, however, he did not include the detachable portion of the offer identifying the policy by the insured’s name and number, as the carrier had requested. The trial court granted summary judgment for the carrier, holding that the request for return of the detachable…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Carr v. DuvalSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
- Durasteel Co. v. Great Lakes Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953
- Van Hulle v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
- Iselin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Holt v. George Washington Life InsuranceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Meade v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Overman v. BrownNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
- Samenow v. Citicorp Credit Services, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- O'Malley v. Chevy Chase Bank, F.S.B.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- Reo Acquisition Group, LLC v. Federal National Mortgage AssociationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.