Legal Opinion

Susan Murman v. Patricia Murman

District Court, N.D. California

Decided February 11, 2026No. 1:24-cv-01439Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 EUREKA DIVISION 7 8 SUSAN MURMAN, Case No. 24-cv-01439-RMI 9 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S 10 v. MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT 11 PATRICIA MURMAN, Re: Dkt. No. 59 12 Defendant. 13 14 The court recently denied the cross motions for summary judgment, partially granted 15 Defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, and allowed Plaintiff to file an amended 16 complaint. (Order, dkt. 55.) Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) pursuant to the 17 court’s Order. (Dkt. 56.) Now pending before the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. Ferguson v. KochCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API