Horizon Coal Corporation v. United States of America, Jerry Kohl D/B/A Kohl Industries, Third-Party
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Per curiam
A coal mine operator initiated this action seeking reimbursement of reclamation fees paid to the government. The district court granted the operator’s motion for summary judgment and ordered the government to refund the fees with interest. The government appeals, arguing, inter alia, that the district court erred by (1) exercising jurisdiction over this matter; (2) holding that shale removed from the mine in question was “removed for purposes of commercial use” within the meaning of 30 U.S.C. § 1291(28)(A); and (3) awarding interest to the operator. For the following reasons, we affirm in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Holmes Limestone Co. v. Cecil B. AndrusCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- S & G Excavating, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
- Save Our Cumberland Mountains, Inc. v. LujanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Kentuckians for the Commonwealth v. United States Army Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Wyodak Resources Development Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- The E.W. Scripps Company and Subsidiaries v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Brittany Montrois v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Harmon Industries, Inc. v. BrownerDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.