Legal Opinion

Rubin v. Lucerne & Aurelia Crown Railway Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1915No. 12783PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Chelan county, Gcrimshaw, J., entered October 15, 1914, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on contract, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.

This action was brought to recover upon three causes of action: first, for an alleged balance of $1,100 for services rendered by the plaintiff to the defendant corporation from January 1, 1912, until January 14, 1913, at an agreed salary of $150 per month; second, for the alleged use of a team of horses at $50 per month for the same period; and third, for supplies furnished to the defendant of the alleged value of $100.07. The answer denied that there was any balance due the plaintiff, and alleged a counterclaim of $2,500 for defective work done by the plaintiff for the defendant. The case…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carr v. CohnWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Sorrill v. McGouganWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Coates v. TeaboWashington Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Francisco v. FranciscoMontana Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Hamlin v. FlickWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Hagerty v. HallMontana Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Legal Adjustment Bureau v. West Coast Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API