Legal Opinion

State v. Phillips

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided July 23, 1971No. 674PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOOD, Chief Judge.

Convicted of burglary and larceny of personal property of a value over $100 but less than $2500, defendant appeals. Section 40A-16-3, N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl.Vol. 6) and § 40A-16-1, N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl.Vol. 6, Supp.1969). There are two issues: (1) sufficiency of the circumstantial evidence to sustain the convictions and (2) sufficiency of the evidence as to the value of the stolen items. We hold the evidence is insufficient to sustain the burglary conviction. We affirm the larceny conviction.

Circumstantial evidence.

A residence was burglarized; two television sets, jewelry…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. OchoaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
  2. State v. HarrisonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. State v. SalazarNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  4. State v. ZarafonetisNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. State v. ParkerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. DominguezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. State v. LandleeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Martin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
  4. State v. AtwoodNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. State v. GallegosNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API