In re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JV-501010
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KLEINSCHMIDT, Judge.
The juvenile appeals from an adjudication of delinquency for two counts of burglary and three counts of theft. He argues that the juvenile court erred by failing to suppress certain incriminating statements he made to the investigating officer. Because the statements may have been induced by a promise or threat, we remand this case to the juvenile court for additional findings.
On a morning in August of 1991, a deputy sheriff was investigating reports that several motorcycles had been stolen the previous night. A neighbor of the juvenile advised the deputy that the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- State v. Amaya-RuizArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. HudgensArizona Supreme Court · 1967
- In re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Delinquency Action No. 97036-02Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Appeal in Navajo County Juvenile Action No. JV91000058Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
- In Re Jorge D.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- In Re Timothy C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1998