Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Ormonde

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 5, 2006No. H028471PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McADAMS, J.

Following the denial of his motion to suppress evidence pursuant to Penal Code section 1538.5, defendant Richard A. Ormonde pleaded no contest to possession of cocaine for sale (count 1), possession of methamphetamine for sale (count 2), possession of methylenedioxy amphetamine for sale (count 3), possession of marijuana for sale (count 4), and possession of an assault weapon (count 5). (Health & Saf. Code, §§ 11351, 11378, 11359; Pen. Code, § 12280, subd. (b).) He also admitted in connection with the first three counts that he was personally armed with a firearm, and in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Brigham City v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Maryland v. BuieSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. WernerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. People v. ChungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. People v. ChungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. People v. HochstraserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. People v. TorresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API