Legal Opinion
People v. Chung
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 3, 2010No. B212210PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
185 Cal.App.4th 247 (2010)
110 Cal. Rptr. 3d 253
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
KEITH CHUNG, Defendant and Appellant.
No. B212210.
Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.
June 3, 2010.
William L. Heyman, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, Assistant Attorney General, Jaime L. Fuster and Tannaz Kouhpainezhad, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
OPINION
KLEIN, P. J.
Keith Chung was charged by information…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Brigham City v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Maryland v. BuieSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Welsh v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. KnightsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. DuncanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
- People v. Williams, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY v. FONDRENCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2022
- CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY v. FONDRENCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2022
- Jeremy Deray Lawton v. Commonwealth of KentuckyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2020