Legal Opinion
Arizona v. California
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided October 10, 2000No. 8PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The Special Master has submitted a proposed supplemental decree in this case to carry the parties’ accords into effect. The proposed decree was reproduced as an appendix to the Court’s opinion dated June 19, 2000 (530 U. S. 392, 420), and any objections were called for. No objections were filed with the Clerk. Accordingly, the proposed supplemental decree with respect to the Fort Mojave and Colorado River Reservations is approved and entered.
*2SUPPLEMENTAL DECREE
It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED:
A. Paragraph (4) of Article 11(D) of the Decree in this case entered on March 9, 1964 (376 U. S.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
3Cited by14 opinions
- Karuk Tribe of Northern California v. California Regional Water Quality Control Bd., North Coast RegionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Osherow v. Porras (In Re Porras)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 2004
- Brown v. Transurban USA, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015
- Arizona v. Navajo NationSupreme Court of the United States · 2023
- Dennis Lauterbach, Sr. v. Michael HuertaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.