Legal Opinion

Arizona v. California

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 16, 1984No. 8 ORIGPublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL DECREE.

The Court having, on March 30, 1983, rendered its decision on the several Exceptions to the Final Report of the Special Master herein, approving the recommendation that the Fort Mojave Indian Tribe, the Chemehuevi Indian Tribe, the Colorado River Indian Tribes, the Quechan Indian Tribe, and the Cocopah Indian Tribe be permitted to intervene, approving some of his further recommendations and disapproving others, all as specified in this Court’s opinion, 460 U. S. 605 (1983), the following supplemental decree is now entered to implement the decision of March 30, 1983.

I…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Legal Aid Society v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
  3. Karuk Tribe of Northern California v. California Regional Water Quality Control Bd., North Coast RegionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. Blevins Electric, Inc. v. First American National Bank (In Re Blevins Electric, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1995
  5. Buntin v. City of BostonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API