Legal Opinion

State v. A.O.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided November 27, 2007PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

S.L. REISNER, J.A.D.

Defendant AO. appeals from his conviction for first-degree aggravated sexual assault on a child, C.I., and the sentence of eighteen years imprisonment with a nine-year parole bar.

We reverse the conviction on two grounds. First, we hold that defendant’s stipulation as to the admissibility at trial of polygraph test results, which he executed without benefit of counsel, was constitutionally invalid. We disagree with State v. Reyes, 237 N.J.Super. 250, 567 A.2d 287 (App.Div.1989), and in any event we conclude it is no longer good law,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. United States v. SchefferSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. State v. MacOnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
  5. State v. ReddishSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. A.O.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
  2. State v. MervilusNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011
  3. State v. ChenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
  4. State v. AONew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
  5. STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. EVENS DUMAS (15-04-0466, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API