Legal Opinion
State v. AO
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 27, 2007PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
935 A.2d 1202 (2007)
397 N.J. Super. 8
STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent
v.
A.O., Defendant-Appellant.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued September 24, 2007.
Decided November 27, 2007.
Michael J. Confusione, Designated Counsel, argued the cause for appellant (Yvonne Smith Segars, Public Defender, attorney; Mr. Confusione, on the brief).
Sara B. Liebman, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (Theodore J. Romankow, Union County Prosecutor, attorney; Steven J. Kaflowitz, Assistant Prosecutor, on the brief).
Before Judges WEISSBARD, S.L. REISNER and GILROY.
The…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. SchefferSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- State v. MacOnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. A.O.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2009