Shideler v. Fisher

The incompleteness and inadequacy of the abstract would justify an affirmance of the judgment without any consideration of the errors which counsel have assigned and discussed. It is the undoubted rule of both appellate courts that wher*108ever parties are aggrieved by a judgment which they desire to have reviewed, they must present in an abstract all the material necessary to a complete and adequate understanding of the issues. This has not been done. But several questions are suggested by the argument which have a quasi support in the abstract, and since we have reached a conclusion about one…