United States v. Miller
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
1Opinion of the Court
Judge STUCKY delivered the ¿pinion of the Court.
The Judge Advocate General of the Air Force certified an issue to this Court under Article 67(a)(2), Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 867(a)(2) (2000), asking whether a military judge abused his discretion in granting a motion to suppress all evidence resulting from Appellee’s urinalysis. We find that the military judge did not abuse his discretion in suppressing the urinalysis results.1
*307i.
Senior Master Sergeant (SMSgt) Van Lin-gen was assigned as the Drug Demand Reduction Program Manager and the Drug Testing Program…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. AyalaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
- United States v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
- United States v. GoreCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
- United States v. Melvin D. Wallace and Arthur M. LevinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Lopez de VictoriaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- United States v. FlesherCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2014
- United States v. StellatoCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2015
- United States v. GranerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2010
- United States v. Sergeant ERIC D. SHORTSArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017
- United States v. IrizarryCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2013
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.