Legal Opinion

United States v. Irizarry

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided April 15, 2013No. 12-0451/AFPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge STUCKY

delivered the opinion of the court:1

We granted review to determine whether the military judge erred in refusing to suppress military property seized by Appellant’s first sergeant after a warrantless entry into Appellant’s off-base apartment. We hold that the military judge did not abuse his discretion. Under the facts and circumstances of this case, Appellant’s Fourth Amendment rights were not violated because the entry into his apartment was not unreasonable.

I. Posture of the Case

Contrary to his pleas, Appellant was convicted by officer members in a general court-martial of one…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Irizarry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. United States v. BessCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2020
  3. United States v. BessCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2020
  4. United States v. CriswellCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2018
  5. United States v. CriswellCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API