United States v. Irizarry
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
1Opinion of the Court
Judge STUCKY
delivered the opinion of the court:1
We granted review to determine whether the military judge erred in refusing to suppress military property seized by Appellant’s first sergeant after a warrantless entry into Appellant’s off-base apartment. We hold that the military judge did not abuse his discretion. Under the facts and circumstances of this case, Appellant’s Fourth Amendment rights were not violated because the entry into his apartment was not unreasonable.
I. Posture of the Case
Contrary to his pleas, Appellant was convicted by officer members in a general court-martial of one…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Irizarry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- United States v. BessCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2020
- United States v. BessCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2020
- United States v. CriswellCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2018
- United States v. CriswellCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.