Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Solomon
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.
1. It can not held as a matter of law that the plaintiff would not be entitled to recover under the allegations of the petition *738and the proof submitted in its support. Sherrod v. A., B. & A. Ry. Co., 27 Ga. App. 510 (108 S. E. 908).
2. Contrary to the Georgia rule, under the Federal employer’s liability aet a plaintiff in a homicide ease is entitled to recover only such damages as would represent the pecuniary value, capable of a monetary measurement, of the contributions which the decedent would probably have made for the benefit of the plaintiff beneficiary had he not been killed. W. & A.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Southern Ry. Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
- Southern Railway Co. v. WessingerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Western & Atlantic Railroad v. TownsendCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
- Sherrod v. Atlanta, Birmingham & Atlantic Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
- Watson v. Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Tadlock v. TadlockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008