Legal Opinion
National Sponge Cushion Co., Inc., a Corporation v. Rubber Corporation of California
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 21, 1961No. 16562PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POPE, Circuit Judge.
The appellant, owner of Harwin Patent No. 2,740,739, for Carpet Underlay, brought this action against the appellee charging infringement of its patent and seeking damages therefor. After issue joined, the case was tried to a jury which returned a verdict for the plaintiff. Thereafter the court granted defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict under Rule 50(b) of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., and entered judgment accordingly for the defendant.
The action of the court was based upon the findings of the trial judge that the claimed patent…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Carnegie Steel Co. v. Cambria Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Ray-O-Vac Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Mumm v. Jacob E. Decker & SonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Saf-Gard Products, Inc. v. Service Parts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Neff Instrument Corp. v. Cohu Electronics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
- National Lead Company v. Western Lead Products Company, Western Lead Products Company v. National Lead CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
- Penn International Industries v. Pennington Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Robert Sarkisian v. Winn-Proof Corp., William A. Werner, and Wer-Nel Enterprises, Inc., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.