Legal Opinion

Gentilala v. Fay Taxicabs, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 30, 1925PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Finch, J.:

This is an action for damages for personal injuries, brought on behalf of an infant who was struck by a taxicab owned by the defendant.

The issues of fact arising have been submitted to a jury, and no sufficient reason is presented for disturbing their verdict thereon. There is, however, presented as an additional ground of appeal a question of law which requires the reversal of the judgment.

The facts, in so far as necessary to determine this question of law, are, briefly, as follows: The defendant in its answer by way of defense alleged that there was another action pending between…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matter of Petition of ButlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Porter v. . KingsburyNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  3. Hirsh v. Manhattan Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  4. Stevenson v. Diamond Fuel Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  5. Bowker Fertilizer Co. v. . CoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1887

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Farmers Trust Co. v. BradshawCity of New York Municipal Court · 1930
  2. Ace Tackless Corp. v. FuhrmanNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Ferguson v. HarderNew York Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Weber v. WardNew York Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Blessington v. McCrory Stores Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API