Weber v. Ward
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMorschattser, J.
When these actions were originally commenced Clarence H. Venner was not a party plaintiff. Upon his application and by order of the court he was permitted to become one of the plaintiffs in each action. The actions are now at issue.
It was evident on the hearing of these motions that the original plaintiffs Deininger, Kolb and Weber do not desire to associate with or continue the actions with Mr. Venner as a plaintiff. They ask that they be permitted to withdraw and discontinue the actions as to them, allowing Mr. Venner to continue alone as party plaintiff. Defendants have no objection and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Brinckerhoff v. . BostwickNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Hirshfeld v. . FitzgeraldNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Winans v. . WinansNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Matter of Petition of ButlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Carleton v. . DarcyNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Manufacturers Mutual Fire Insurance v. HopsonNew York Supreme Court · 1940
- In re the Estate of JanowitzNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
- Donavan v. ShaheenNew York Supreme Court · 1962