Legal Opinion

Dickson v. Dinsmore

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 16, 1929No. 6 Div. 200PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

It has long been established in Alabama that one method of impeaching a witness is, after a proper predicate to the witness, to prove that he made a statement contradictory of that given in evidence, and that when there is such nature of impeaching evidence, the party offering the witness has the privilege of supporting his veracity by proof of the general good character of the witness, though this is shown in 6 Jones on Evidence, § 2454, and 2 Wig-more on Evidence, § 1108, to be contrary to what those authorities consider the better 'view.

We are requested here by counsel for appellee to…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. FrawleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Morgan Hill Paving Co. v. FonvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  3. Peters v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1902
  4. McGeever v. O'ByrneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  5. Baucum v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. McDowell v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  2. Dixie Stage Lines v. AndersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  3. Phillips v. AshworthSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  4. Proctor v. CoffeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  5. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. JamesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API