Legal Opinion

Phillips v. Ashworth

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 10, 1929No. 7 Div. 859PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

This is an action for damages for the seduction of plaintiff by defendant. The authority for the suit is section 5602, Code. No such action existed at common law. This provision of law gives a right of action to an “unmarried woman” for her own seduction. The criminal statute, section 5490, Code, likewise makes it a felony to seduce an “unmarried woman.” Plaintiff in this case claims to be an “unmarried woman,” though she had been married, but claims to have been divorced at the time of the alleged seduction.

The question is presented directly by this appeal whether a divorced woman is an…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Cross v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  2. Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. GonzalezSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  3. Martin v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  4. Baucum v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  5. Whatley v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Kilcrease v. HarrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  2. Wilkerson v. WilkersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  3. Garrett v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  4. Alabama Power Company v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
  5. Breece v. JettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API