Legal Opinion

UNL Inc. v. Oak Hills Photo Finishing, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided July 22, 1987No. 04-86-00241-CVPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIAL, Justice.

This is an appeal from the denial of a motion for new trial following a default judgment rendered against appellant, UNL Incorporated (hereinafter referred to as “UNL”). The judgment awarded treble damages and attorney’s fees to appellees, Oak Hills Photo Finishing, Inc. and Chase Leasing Co., Ltd., under the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act (DTPA). TEX. BUS. & COM.CODE ANN. § 17.41, et seq. (Vernon Supp.1987).

Appellees, plaintiffs below, originally brought suit against three nonresident defendants: UNL, Zyco Manufacturing, Inc. (both foreign corporations), and Jim Elliot.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Stoner v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Morgan v. Compugraphic Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
  4. McKanna v. EdgarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Ivy v. CarrellTexas Supreme Court · 1966

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Suzanne Frame v. S-H, Inc., Allan James, Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  2. Bludworth Bond Shipyard, Inc. v. M/v Caribbean Wind, Her Engines, Tackle, Etc., in Rem, Rolf WesterstromCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  3. Diamond Shamrock Refining and Marketing Co. v. Mendez, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1991
  4. Rubalcaba v. Pacific/Atlantic Crop Exchange, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1997
  5. New v. TEXAS COMMERCE BANK, NAT. ASS'N, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API