Suzanne Frame v. S-H, Inc., Allan James, Intervenors-Appellees

SNEED, Circuit Judge:

Suzanne Frame, described by the district court as a “disingenuous, obstreperous, obfuscating pain,” appeals from a judgment in excess of $10.2 million entered against her as a sanction for repeated discovery abuses. It is unfortunate that we cannot put this litigation, which has lingered in the courts for seven years, to a swift end. Because of an inconsistency in the record, we are forced to remand. We do so only for a limited purpose.

' I.

FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW

This case has its beginnings in a suit originally filed in late 1986 by Suzanne Frame and two of her…