Legal Opinion

Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Coe

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided December 22, 1941No. 7533PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDGERTON, Associate Justice.

This is a suit under R.S. § 4915, 35 U.S. C.A. § 63, to obtain a patent on an abrasive article in the nature of sandpaper. On the court’s own motion the case was reheard on October 13, 1941, together with No. 7400, Sharp v. Coe, -App.D.C. -, 125 F.2d *199185, and No. 7374, Dyer v. Coe, -App. D.C.,-, 125 F.2d 192, upon the question, common to all three cases, whether a court in passing upon the patentability of claims rejected by the Patent Office may use allowed claims as a measure of patentability. This question was reargued, and briefs thereon were presented,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Abbott v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  2. United States v. Esnault-PelterieSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Shellman v. ShellmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  4. Goodacre v. PanagopoulosCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  5. Societe Suisse Pour Valeurs De Metaux v. CummingsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hoover Co. v. CoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Hanovia Chemical & Mfg. Co. v. David Buttrick Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1942
  3. Refrigeration Engineering v. York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
  4. Spenard Plumbing & Heating Co. v. WrightAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Dyer v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API