Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Coe
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EDGERTON, Associate Justice.
This is a suit under R.S. § 4915, 35 U.S. C.A. § 63, to obtain a patent on an abrasive article in the nature of sandpaper. On the court’s own motion the case was reheard on October 13, 1941, together with No. 7400, Sharp v. Coe, -App.D.C. -, 125 F.2d *199185, and No. 7374, Dyer v. Coe, -App. D.C.,-, 125 F.2d 192, upon the question, common to all three cases, whether a court in passing upon the patentability of claims rejected by the Patent Office may use allowed claims as a measure of patentability. This question was reargued, and briefs thereon were presented,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Abbott v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- United States v. Esnault-PelterieSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Shellman v. ShellmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
- Goodacre v. PanagopoulosCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- Societe Suisse Pour Valeurs De Metaux v. CummingsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hoover Co. v. CoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanovia Chemical & Mfg. Co. v. David Buttrick Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1942
- Refrigeration Engineering v. York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
- Spenard Plumbing & Heating Co. v. WrightAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
- Dyer v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.