Legal Opinion

Richeson v. Leist, Ca2006-11-138 (7-16-2007)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 16, 2007No. CA2006-11-138PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Plaintiffs-appellants, Walter and Cheryl Richeson, appeal the decision of the Warren County Court of Common Pleas granting summary judgment to defendant-appellee, Delores Keller, in a personal injury action involving a dog attack.1 For the reasons that follow, we affirm the trial court's judgment.

{¶ 2} Appellee is the owner of a single-family residence located on State Route 48 in Maineville, Ohio. In February 2002, Corey Leist2 rented the residence from appellee pursuant to a written lease. At the time he entered into the lease agreement with appellee, Leist owned a Rottweiler…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Horton v. Harwick Chem. Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Burgess v. TackasOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Cooper v. RooseOhio Supreme Court · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Martin v. LambertOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Vallejo v. HaynesOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Brown v. TerrellOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Pangallo v. AdkinsOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Morris v. CordellOhio Court of Appeals · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API