Legal Opinion

Chavira v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 21, 1991No. B051525PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ORTEGA, J.

—Respondent Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (Board) determined the application for workers’ compensation benefits in this asbestos case is barred by the statute of limitations. We conclude substantial evidence does not support the Board’s finding that more than one year before the application was filed applicant knew or in the exercise of reasonable diligence should have known he had disability that was caused by his employment. We therefore annul the Board’s decision after reconsideration and remand for further proceedings.

Facts

Ernest Chavira, applicant, was employed by…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lamb v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Marsh v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Nickelsberg v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Fruehauf Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Huston v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hanson v. Lucky Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
  2. Gelfo v. Lockheed Martin CorporationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  3. Western Growers Insurance v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. Flor v. HolguinHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Genlyte Group, LLC v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API