Legal Opinion

O'KELLEY v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 25, 2004No. S04A1227PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUNSTEIN, Justice.

This Court granted interim review in the pending death penalty prosecution of Dorian Frank O’Kelley and directed the parties to address the following question:

Whether appellant’s indicating, at an initial appearance before a magistrate judge, his desire to have an attorney represent him renders his subsequent statement to an interrogator inadmissible at trial.

For the reasons set forth below, we answer this question in the affirmative and, accordingly, reverse the judgment of the trial court refusing to suppress the statement in question.

1. On April 12, 2002, O’Kelley was…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Coleman v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. McNeil v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Michigan v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Rothgery v. Gillespie CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Vergara v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
  3. Stinski v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
  4. Kemp v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2018
  5. KEMP v. THE STATE (Three Cases)Supreme Court of Georgia · 2018

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API