Legal Opinion
Fredrick v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided December 18, 1974No. 255-73PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCoweN, Chief Judge
Plaintiff was formerly employed as a Supervisory Aircraft Quality Control Eepresentative, GS-1942-12, for the Defense Supply Agency, Defense Contract Administration Services Eegion, Dallas (DCASK-Dallas). In the spring of 1971, after receiving a Separation/Keduction-in-Force (EIF) Notice, he retired from his position, and he has not been rehired by the agency. In this case, plaintiff claims that he is entitled to reinstatement to his former position and back pay from the date of his allegedly involuntary retirement, because he was erroneously not afforded the job retention protection of 5…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Frontiero v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- F. S. Royster Guano Co. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Johnson v. RobisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Schneider v. RuskSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Crowley v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- Puglisi v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
- Black v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
- First National Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
- Bruinooge v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.