Legal Opinion

Patton v. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1926No. Docket No. 29PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Rehearing.

Bird, J.

This case has been considered again, on rehearing. Mr. Justice Clark has written on the re hearing. I am in accord with his conclusion, but am at variance with his statement that “the theory of gross negligence ought to have been omitted from the charge.” It is conceded that LaBarre, the brakeman in charge, waved the waiting vehicles across the track behind the caboose. The occupants of the vehicles could not see the west-bound track to the east, and but for the brakeman’s invitation it was a negligent act upon their part to attempt to cross- behind the caboose without…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gibbard v. CursanMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Denman v. JohnstonMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Knickerbocker v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Frost v. Milwaukee & Northern RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Wexel v. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lett v. Summerfield & HechtMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Riley v. WaltersMichigan Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API