Legal Opinion

Colthurst v. Harris

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 9, 1929No. Docket No. 6750PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal from an order denying defendant’s motion to vacate and set aside the default entered against him for failure to answer the complaint and to vacate the judgment entered thereon awarding plaintiff damages for personal injuries and nervous shock sustained while she was riding as a guest in defendant’s automobile which was overturned, as it is alleged, through the reckless and negligent management of the automobile by the defendant. Respondent has moved for an order affirming the judgment, but as the motion presents the same question raised on the appeal,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. Ah SamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Herrlich v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Thomas v. Superior Court, Etc.California Court of Appeal · 1907
  4. Wheelock v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  5. Jones v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Richert v. Benson Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
  2. Donald J. v. Evna M.California Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. Milstein v. SartainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Duncan v. Oakland BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. Knox v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API