Legal Opinion

Building Code Action v. Energy Resources Conservation & Development Commission

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 26, 1980No. Civ. 44571PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FEINBERG, J.

The facts of the case are partially set forth in the opinion of this court upon denial of a petition for writ of supersedeas. (Building Code Action v. Energy Resources Conservation & Dev. Com. (1979) 88 Cal.App.3d 913 [152 Cal.Rptr. 214].) The facts material to this appeal are as follows:

In March 1976, the Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission (Commission) gave notice of hearings on proposed amendments to energy conservation regulations for new residential construction. Over the next year, a series of hearings were held before a committee of the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Int. Com. Comm. v. Louis. & Nash. RRSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. United States & Interstate Commerce Commission v. Abilene & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Pitts v. PerlussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Davidon Homes v. City of San JoseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  2. Western Oil & Gas Assn. v. Air Resources BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  3. CALIFORNIA HOSPITAL ASSN. v. Maxwell-JollyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. Stauffer Chemical Co. v. Air Resources BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  5. Stauffer Chemical Co. v. Air Resources BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API